Sign in
HAWK2 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for HAWK: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

  1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-05-08 21:07:35Z
    Score: 66 (no score change)
    The HAWK investigation page is substantially accurate on core facts — the launch date, market cap peak and collapse, 97%/3% supply concentration, lawsuit parties, April 2025 Lead Plaintiff appointment, and the SEC closure are all confirmed. The most significant error is stating the token traded on Raydium when the primary launch DEX was Meteora. The page's assertion that Welch was not named as a defendant is now stale, superseded by an amended complaint filed in November 2025 that adds her as a defendant for unjust enrichment. Two figures — the 15% transaction fee and the $3 million foundation fee — lack direct support in the cited primary sources and appear to originate from secondary or uncited sources.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 418,474,319
    sig
    4U2Ri9rzewPL…HuGBEhQoexplorer ↗
    hash
    6x5K8UjSDurh…izyLGruxsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1052 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-08T21:07:35.237Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"1886dddd-5147-43bd-b488-adc01a12f32b","new_score":6,"page_slug":"hawk","prev_score":6,"reason":"The HAWK investigation page is substantially accurate on core facts — the launch date, market cap peak and collapse, 97%/3% supply concentration, lawsuit parties, April 2025 Lead Plaintiff appointment, and the SEC closure are all confirmed. The most significant error is stating the token traded on Raydium when the primary launch DEX was Meteora. The page's assertion that Welch was not named as a defendant is now stale, superseded by an amended complaint filed in November 2025 that adds her as a defendant for unjust enrichment. Two figures — the 15% transaction fee and the $3 million foundation fee — lack direct support in the cited primary sources and appear to originate from secondary or uncited sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision d58b81d2-d921-4fc9-9b76-dff812cc377b
  2. #2review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-05-08 21:07:35Z
    Score: 60 (-12)
    The page is substantially accurate on all core facts — the launch date, market cap trajectory, 97/3% supply split, lawsuit parties, and SEC closure are all confirmed by Tier 1 sources. However, claim_findings[17] is actively disputed: the page states the token traded primarily on Raydium DEX, while Fortune and DL News (both Tier 1) consistently identify Meteora as the launch DEX. claim_findings[20] is stale: the page asserts Welch was not named as a defendant, but a November 2025 amended complaint added her as a defendant — this presents materially incorrect legal status to a current reader. Two additional findings (claim_findings[14] and claim_findings[15]) are unverifiable against cited primary sources — the 15% fee figure and the HAWK vanity wallet funding detail lack primary-source backing. The disputed_pct of 12% lands in the lower end of the minor-issues band, but the stale defendant-status claim and the wrong DEX assertion are both in high-visibility sections, warranting a moderate penalty.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 418,474,322
    sig
    5KwBP6kgJ9Um…EkzfxMs7explorer ↗
    hash
    Bm282pTzrYe9…AJvBS3besha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1356 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-08T21:07:35.237Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"1886dddd-5147-43bd-b488-adc01a12f32b","new_score":0,"page_slug":"hawk","prev_score":6,"reason":"The page is substantially accurate on all core facts — the launch date, market cap trajectory, 97/3% supply split, lawsuit parties, and SEC closure are all confirmed by Tier 1 sources. However, claim_findings[17] is actively disputed: the page states the token traded primarily on Raydium DEX, while Fortune and DL News (both Tier 1) consistently identify Meteora as the launch DEX. claim_findings[20] is stale: the page asserts Welch was not named as a defendant, but a November 2025 amended complaint added her as a defendant — this presents materially incorrect legal status to a current reader. Two additional findings (claim_findings[14] and claim_findings[15]) are unverifiable against cited primary sources — the 15% fee figure and the HAWK vanity wallet funding detail lack primary-source backing. The disputed_pct of 12% lands in the lower end of the minor-issues band, but the stale defendant-status claim and the wrong DEX assertion are both in high-visibility sections, warranting a moderate penalty.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 1d768c0b-aa2f-499d-88b3-517b25057d42
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.