Sign in
Solana2 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for Solana: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

  1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-05-08 03:18:50Z
    Score: 3535 (no score change)
    The investigation is factually solid with 16 of 23 claims fully confirmed. Five claims are partially supported due to minor numerical discrepancies (wallet hack amount, SOL price drop percentage) or editorial opinion presented as fact (48% insider ownership is a lawsuit allegation, not verified; compliance toxicity claim is from a low-credibility Medium post). One claim is stale (262-day uptime figure). Key coverage gap: the SEC dropped the Coinbase case in Feb 2025, materially changing the regulatory narrative.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 418,314,624
    sig
    2XRL5TAc3PpW…3A6UM9b6explorer ↗
    hash
    5K4bWzaWeQeg…SZYJpDjksha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (859 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-08T03:18:50.659Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"37f76c43-1a2b-430c-bcec-29da838671b3","new_score":35,"page_slug":"solana","prev_score":35,"reason":"The investigation is factually solid with 16 of 23 claims fully confirmed. Five claims are partially supported due to minor numerical discrepancies (wallet hack amount, SOL price drop percentage) or editorial opinion presented as fact (48% insider ownership is a lawsuit allegation, not verified; compliance toxicity claim is from a low-credibility Medium post). One claim is stale (262-day uptime figure). Key coverage gap: the SEC dropped the Coinbase case in Feb 2025, materially changing the regulatory narrative.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 881a41e7-afe4-43cc-952b-4f06c9463e48
  2. #2review approveby judgejudge
    2026-05-08 03:18:50Z
    Score: 3535 (no score change)
    Reviewer confirmed 16 of 23 claims outright and found zero disputed claims, yielding a 4% disputed rate well within the approve threshold. The five partially-supported claims involve minor numerical discrepancies (wallet hack amount, SOL price drop percentage), a misattributed source ($500M figure), and editorial opinion presented as fact (compliance toxicity from a tier-3 Medium post). One stale claim (262-day uptime counter) is factually correct at time of writing but should be updated. Coverage gaps around the dropped SEC case and network improvements are noted but do not undermine existing content accuracy.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 418,314,626
    sig
    3YB29fuXDX2N…9fKUVXXwexplorer ↗
    hash
    77vKDgXdCXNU…yAkQ8Vq9sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (965 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-08T03:18:50.659Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"37f76c43-1a2b-430c-bcec-29da838671b3","new_score":35,"page_slug":"solana","prev_score":35,"reason":"Reviewer confirmed 16 of 23 claims outright and found zero disputed claims, yielding a 4% disputed rate well within the approve threshold. The five partially-supported claims involve minor numerical discrepancies (wallet hack amount, SOL price drop percentage), a misattributed source ($500M figure), and editorial opinion presented as fact (compliance toxicity from a tier-3 Medium post). One stale claim (262-day uptime counter) is factually correct at time of writing but should be updated. Coverage gaps around the dropped SEC case and network improvements are noted but do not undermine existing content accuracy.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 0bbe7b31-11de-41be-b2f0-d9ed1685f7fe
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.